EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
FIRST SECTION
CASE OF ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Application No. 22519/02)
JUDGMENT <*>
(Strasbourg, 13.IV.2006)
--------------------------------
<*> This judgment will become final in the circumstances set
out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to
editorial revision.
In the case of Alekhina and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as
a Chamber composed of:
Mr C.L. Rozakis, President,
Mr L. Loucaides,
Mrs F. Tulkens,
Mr P. Lorenzen,
Mrs {N. Vajic} <*>,
--------------------------------
<*>
.
Mrs S. Botoucharova,
Mr A. Kovler, judges
and Mr S. Nielsen, Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 23 March 2006,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that
date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in an application (No. 22519/02) against
the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms ("the Convention") by fifty-eight Russian national listed
in appendix 1 on 20 November 2001.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were represented
by Mr P. Laptev, Representative of the Russian Federation at the
European Court of Human Rights.
3. On 7 October 2003 the Court decided to communicate the
application to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29
3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the
application at the same time as its admissibility.
THE FACTS
I. The circumstances of the case
4. The applicants live in the Voronezh Region.
5. They are in receipt of welfare payments for their children.
In 1999 - 2001 the applicants brought separate sets of civil
proceedings against a local welfare authority, claiming arrears in
those payments.
6. On the dates set out in appendix 1 the domestic courts
granted the applicants' claims and ordered the welfare authority
to pay them the respective amounts. The enforcement proceedings
were commenced accordingly.
7. On 26 July 2001 the bailiffs discontinued the enforcement
proceedings in respect of the judgments in the applicants' favour
and returned them the writs of execution referring to the lack of
the debtor's funds.
8. Thereafter the applicants unsuccessfully applied to various
public bodies seeking to have the judgments in their favour
enforced.
9. In January and February 2004 the applicants were paid the
amounts due pursuant to the writs of execution.
II. Relevant domestic law
10. Section 9 of the Federal Law on Enforcement Proceedings of
21 July 1997 provides that a bailiff's order on the institution of
enforcement proceedings must fix a time-limit for the defendant's
voluntary compliance with a writ of execution. The time-limit may
not exceed five days. The bailiff must also warn the defendant
that coercive action will follow, should the defendant fail to
comply with the time-limit.
11. Under Section 13 of the Law, the enforcement proceedings
should be completed within two months of the receipt of the writ
of enforcement by the bailiff.
THE LAW
I. Withdrawal of thirteen applicants
12. On 20 February and 19 March 2004 the Government informed
the Court that thirteen of the applicants, namely Ms Lyudmila
Ilyinichna Borzykh, Ms Larisa Ivanovna Vysotskaya, Ms Larisa
Ivanovna Danilova, Ms Olga Mitrofanovna Kontsova, Ms Lyudmila
Dmitriyevna Kryuchkova, Ms Nina Leonidovna Kuznetsova, Mr Nikolay
Anatolyevich Popov, Ms Svetlana Alekseyevna Trofimova, Ms Yelena
Federovna Khlopova, Ms Valentina Ivanovna Chernyshova, Ms Natalya
Yuryevna Chernyshova, Ms Natalya Aleksandrovna Chusova and Ms Nina
Anatolyevna Shaderkina, had accepted an offer in settlement of
their application and invited the Court, in so far as the
complaints of the respective applicants were concerned, to strike
the application out of its list of cases under Article 37 1 (a)
and (b) of the Convention. The Government enclosed copies of
friendly settlement agreements dated 11 and 12 February as well as
12 and 15 March 2004 signed by an official representing the
Government and the applicants. Under these agreements the
Government undertook to pay the judgment debts and compensation in
respect of non-pecuniary damage and legal costs to the applicants,
while the latter declared that they did not intend to pursue the
proceedings before the Court.
13. By registered letters of 2 September 2005 the Court
transmitted copies of the above agreements to the applicants and
invited them to affirm formally, before 7 October 2005, that they
had accepted the settlement in question and that, therefore, they
did not intend to pursue their application. On 3 October 2005 Mr
Nikolay Anatolyevich Popov confirmed that he was satisfied with
the terms of the friendly settlement agreement and did not insist
on the Court's examining his complaints. None of the other twelve
applicants replied.
14. Taking into account the declarations of the aforementioned
thirteen applicants, the formal affirmation by Mr Nikolay
Anatolyevich Popov, and the fact that the remaining twelve
applicants did not submit any comments regarding the friendly
settlement, the Court finds that the matter has been resolved and
the respective applicants have lost interest in pursuing their
application. It finds no reasons of a general character, as
defined in Article 37 1 in fine, which would require the
examination of the application by virtue of that Article.
Accordingly, in so far as the complaints of the thirteen
applicants listed above are concerned, the Court strikes the
application out of its list, in accordance with Article 37 1 of
the Convention (see Tikhomirov and Tikhomirova v. Russia (dec.),
No. 43172/98, 21 March 2002).
II. Alleged violation of Article 6 of the Convention
and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention
15. The remaining applicants complained about the prolonged non-
enforcement of the judgments in their favour. The Court will
examine this complaint under Article 6 1 of the Convention and
Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. These Articles, in
so far as relevant, read as follows:
Article 6 1
"In the determination of his civil rights and obligations...,
everyone is entitled to a fair... hearing... by [a]...
tribunal..."
Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
"Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful
enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his
possessions except in the public interest and subject to the
conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of
international law.
The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair
the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to
control the use of property in accordance with the general
interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions
or penalties."
A. Admissibility
16. The Government notified the Court that the authorities of
the Voronezh Region had attempted to secure a friendly settlement
of the case and that the applicants had refused to accept the
friendly settlement on the terms proposed by the authorities. By
reference to this refusal, the fact that, in any event, the
judgments in the applicants' favour had been enforced, and the
admissibility decision in the case of Aleksentseva and Others v.
Russia (No. 75025/01 et seq., 4 September 2003) the Government
invited the Court to strike out the application, in accordance
with Article 37 1 of the Convention.
17. The applicants disagreed with the Government's arguments
and maintained their complaints. As regards the friendly
settlement proposal, the applicants submitted that the terms of
the offer which authorities of the Voronezh Region had made to
them had been unacceptable.
18. The Court firstly observes that the parties were unable to
agree on the terms of a friendly settlement of the case. It notes
that whilst under certain circumstances an application may indeed
be struck out of its list of cases under Article 37 1 (c) of the
Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by the
respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination
of the case to be continued (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], No.
26307/95, 76, ECHR 2003-...), this procedure is not, as such,
intended to circumvent the applicant's opposition to a friendly
settlement.
19. Moreover, a distinction must be drawn between, on one hand,
declarations made in the context of strictly confidential friendly
settlement proceedings (Article 38 2 of the Convention and Rule
62 2 of the Rules of Court) and, on the other hand, unilateral
declarations made by a respondent Government in public and
adversarial proceedings before the Court.
20. On the facts, the Court observes that the Government failed
to submit any formal statement capable of falling into that
category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect
for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the
Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast,
Akman v. Turkey (striking out), No. 37453/97, 23 - 24, ECHR
2001-VI).
21. As regards the Government's argument that the judgments in
question have already been enforced, the Court considers that the
mere fact that the authorities complied with the judgments after a
substantial delay cannot be viewed in this case as automatically
depriving the applicants of their victim status under the
Convention. (see, e.g., Petrushko v. Russia, No. 36494/02, 16,
24 February 2005).
22. In the light of the above considerations, the Court rejects
the Government's request to strike the application out under
Article 37 of the Convention.
23. The Court notes that the application is not manifestly ill-
founded within the meaning of Article 35 3 of the Convention. It
further notes that it is not inadmissible on any other grounds. It
must therefore be declared admissible.
B. Merits
24. The Government advanced no arguments on the merits of the
application.
25. The applicants maintained their complaint.
26. The Court observes that the judgments in the applicants'
favour remained inoperative for several years. No justification
was advanced by the Government for the respective delays.
27. The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 1
of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising
issues similar to the ones in the present case (see, among other
authorities, Burdov v. Russia, No. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III and,
more recently, Petrushko, cited above, or Poznakhirina v. Russia,
No. 25964/02, 24 February 2005).
28. Having examined the material submitted to it, the Court
notes that the Government did not put forward any fact or argument
capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion in the
present case. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the
Court finds that by failing for years to comply with the
enforceable judgments in the applicants' favour the domestic
authorities prevented them from receiving the money they could
reasonably have expected to receive.
29. There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 1 of
the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
III. Other alleged violations of the Convention
30. The applicants also complained that the lengthy non-
enforcement of the judgments in their favour violated their rights
to effective domestic remedies under Article 13 of the Convention.
31. The Court considers that this complaint is linked to the
above issues of non-enforcement to such an extent that it should
be declared admissible as well. However, having regard to the
finding relating to Article 6 1 (see paragraph 29 above), the
Court considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in
this case, there has been a violation of Article 13.
IV. Application of Article 41 of the Convention
32. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
"If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the
Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of
the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial
reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just
satisfaction to the injured party."
A. Damage
33. The applicants claimed amounts set out in appendix 2 for
pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. The respective amounts
included the judgment debts index-linked to the inflation rate of
50% for the default period as well as penalty payments at a rate
of 1% per day.
34. The Government contested the applicants' claims as wholly
excessive and unjustified. As regards the pecuniary damage, they
pointed out that under national law it was open to the applicants
to file a court claim, seeking interest for the delayed payment of
their judgment debts, and that the domestic courts would calculate
such interest on the basis of a statutory rate which was currently
equal to 14%. Therefore, in the Government's view, the interest
accrued by the applicants should amount to 52% of their judgment
debts. As to the non-pecuniary damage, the Government considered
that should the Court find a violation in this case that would in
itself constitute sufficient just satisfaction.
35. Having regard to the materials in its possession, the Court
accepts the Government's argument and awards the applicants the
respective amounts set out in appendix 2, plus any tax that may be
chargeable.
36. In so far as the compensation of non-pecuniary damage is
concerned, the Court would not exclude that the applicants might
have suffered distress and frustration resulting from the State
authorities' failure to enforce the judgment in their favour.
However, making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court
considers that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself
sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage
sustained by the applicants (see, in a similar context,
Poznakhirina, cited above, 35, Mikhaylova and others v. Russia,
No. 22534/02, 41, 17 November 2005, or Bobrova v. Russia, No.
24654/03, 37, 17 November 2005).
B. Costs and expenses
37. The applicants did not claim reimbursement of their costs
and expenses incurred before the domestic authorities and the
Court. Accordingly, the Court considers that there is no call to
award them any sum on that account.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Decides to strike the application out of its list in so far
as the complaints of Ms Lyudmila Ilyinichna Borzykh, Ms Larisa
Ivanovna Vysotskaya, Ms Larisa Ivanovna Danilova, Ms Olga
Mitrofanovna Kontsova, Ms Lyudmila Dmitriyevna Kryuchkova, Ms Nina
Leonidovna Kuznetsova, Mr Nikolay Anatolyevich Popov, Ms Svetlana
Alekseyevna Trofimova, Ms Yelena Federovna Khlopova, Ms Valentina
Ivanovna Chernyshova, Ms Natalya Yuryevna Chernyshova, Ms Natalya
Aleksandrovna Chusova and Ms Nina Anatolyevna Shaderkina are
concerned;
2. Declares the application admissible in so far as the
complaints of the remaining applicants are concerned;
3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 of the
Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention;
4. Holds that there is no need to examine the complaint under
Article 13 of the Convention;
5. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants,
within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes
final in accordance with Article 44 2 of the Convention, the
respective amounts set out in appendix 2 in respect of pecuniary
damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months
until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above
amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the
European Central Bank during the default period plus three
percentage points;
6. Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself
sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage
sustained by the applicants;
7. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claim for just
satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 April 2006,
pursuant to Rule 77 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Christos ROZAKIS
President
{Soren} NIELSEN
Registrar
Appendix 1
-------------------------T-----------------------------T---------
NAME OF APPLICANT FINAL JUDGMENT TO BE ENFORCED AWARDED
Date/Decision Body AMOUNT
(RUR)
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
1. Ella Vladimirovna 3 April 2000 / the Leninskiy 1,142
Alekhina District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
2. Lyubov Vasilyevna 13 March 2000 / the Sovetskiy 4,841.63
Aseyeva District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
3. Margarita Ivanovna 18 January 2000 / the 4,262.61
Belyayeva Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
4. Irina Ivanovna 5 January 2000 / the 10,189.07
Bondareva Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
5. Lyudmila Ilyinichna 23 October 2000 / the 2,199.16
Borzykh Tsentralny District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
6. Tamara Yakovlevna 10 April and 23 May 2000 / 2,696.23
Buneyeva the Zheleznodorozny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
7. Nadezhda Vasilyevna 5 April 2000 / the Sovetskiy 4,025.36
Buneyeva District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
8. Svetlana Yakovlevna 28 April 2000 / the 4,935.83
Butkova Vorobyevka Town Court of the
Voronezh Region
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
9. Nina Yevgenyevna 13 January 2000 / the 3,833.46
Bykova Tsentralny District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
10. Larisa Ivanovna 7 April 2000 / the 5,717.6
Vysotskaya Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
11. Tatyana Nikolayevna 5 June 2000 / the 2,030.12
Garmysheva Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
12. Natalya Viktorovna 22 May 2000 / the 4,480.13
Gladysheva Zheleznodorozhny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
13. Marina Vasilyevna 14 July 2000 / the 3,402.29
Gunkina Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
14. Larisa Ivanovna 1 September 2000 / the 6,628.5
Danilova Tsentralny District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
15. Olga Gennadyevna 31 October 2000 / the 2,540.98
Dvoretskaya Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
16. Lyudmila Pavlovna 11 October 2000 / the 8,179.31
Zhidkova Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
17. Raisa Aleksandrovna 20 April 2000 / the 3,720.99
Izmaylova Tsentralny District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
18. Lyubov Alekseyevna 20 January 2000 / the 3,857.86
Karabutova Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
19. Svetlana Leonidovna 29 September 2000 / the 4,906.46
Kozhokina Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
20. Olga Mitrofanovna 18 January 2000 / the 3,666.32
Kontsova Leninskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
21. Lyudmila Pavlovna 11 January 2001 / the 4,029.48
Kopylova Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
22. Lyudmila Dmitriyevna5 June 2000 / the 6,449.5
Kryuchkova Zheleznodorozhny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
23. Nina Leonidovna 5 June 2000 / the 5,275.43
Kuznetsova Zheleznodorozhny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
24. Tamara Semenovna 17 April 2000 / the 6,052.56
Kuznetsova Tsentralny District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
25. Larisa Vasilyevna 6 May 2000 / the Sovetskiy 4,122
Maltseva District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
26. Larisa Arkadyevna 12 January 2000 / the 2,831.99
Milyayeva Tsentralny District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
27. Lidiya Viktorovna 7 October 2000 / the 3,009.41
Nemtsova Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
28. Lyudmila 7 June 2000 / the 3,224.75
Aleksandrovna Levoberezhny District Court
Neupokoyeva of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
29. Yelena Viktorovna 21 March 2000 / the 2,822.51
Pavlova Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
30. Svetlana Grigoryevna16 October 2000 / the 3,835.93
Polishchuk Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
31. Nikolay Anatolyevich29 December 2000 / the 2,407.09
Popov Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
32. Tatyana Mikhaylovna 3 April 2000 / the Leninskiy 3,964
Poritskaya District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
33. Mariya Sergeyevna 17 March 2000 / the Sovetskiy 6,944.79
Reshetnikova District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
34. Irina Yegorovna 29 January 2001 / the 5,343.56
Roshchupkina Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
35. Nadezhda Vasilyevna 5 July 2000 / the 1,609.01
Rychkova Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
36. Galina Mikhaylovna 23 February 2001 / the 5,192.15
Ryazantseva Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
37. Galina Gennadyevna 4 August and 29 September 4,101.6
Sanina 2000 / the Zheleznodorozhny
District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
38. Lyudmila Alekseyevna29 May 2000, 27 October 2000 14,019.52
Semchenko and 15 January 2001 / the
Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
39. Antonina Viktorovna 24 March 2000 / the Sovetskiy 6,035.17
Sergeyeva District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
40. Vera Mitrofanovna 16 October 2000 / the 2,163.94
Serikova Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
41. Tatyana Ivanovna 16 May 2000 / the Sovetskiy 14,207.77
Sirotenko District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
42. Aleftina 8 December 1999 / the 3,518
Aleksandrovna Leninskiy District Court of
Skomorokhova Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
43. Natalya Valeryanovna19 June 2001 / the 12,451.31
Solovyeva Zheleznodorozhny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
44. Vladimir Yuzikovich 20 September 2000 / the 2,163.94
Talko Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
45. Nina Ivanovna 25 September 2000 / the 6,149.64
Tolkacheva Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
46. Svetlana Alekseyevna30 November 2000 / the 2,889.48
Trofimova Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
47. Vera Yefimovna 1 December 1999 / the 2,893
Trukhacheva Novovoronezh Town Court of
the Voronezh Region
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
48. Yelena Fedorovna 2 October 2000 / the 2,146.2
Khlopova Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
49. Yelena Nikolayevna 14 March 2000 / the Sovetskiy 1,561.97
Chernikova District Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
50. Lyudmila 8 September 2000 / the 4,464.52
Aleksandrovna Chernykh Sovetskiy District Court of
Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
51. Valentina Ivanovna 21 August 2000 / the 8,171.66
Chernyshova Khokholskiy Town Court of the
Voronezh Region
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
52. Natalya Yuryevna 30 May 2000 / the 7,138.3
Chernyshova Zheleznodorozhny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
53. Natalya 22 May 2000 / the 2,188.4
Aleksandrovna Chusova Zheleznodorozhny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
54. Nina Anatolyevna 24 November 2000 / the 4,445.9
Shaderkina Levoberezhny District Court
of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
55. Valentina Vasilyevna28 April 2001 / the 4,117.63
Yakovleva Zheleznodorozhny District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
56. Svetlana Leonidovna 9 March 1999 / the 3,620.85
Yakovtseva Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
57. Nadezhda Gennadyevna12 April 2000 / the 1,753.07
Yakushchenko Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
+------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
58. Emma Ivanovna 13 April 2000 / the 3,912.23
Yakushchenko Kominternovskiy District
Court of Voronezh
L------------------------+-----------------------------+----------
Appendix 2
----------------------------------------T-------------T----------
NAME OF APPLICANT CLAIMS FOR AMOUNT TO
DAMAGE BE PAID
(RUR) FOR
PECUNIARY
DAMAGE
(RUR)
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
1. Ella Vladimirovna Alekhina 62,865.95 593.84
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
2. Lyubov Vasilyevna Aseyeva 309,205.17 2,517.64
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
3. Margarita Ivanovna Belyayeva 289,503.68 2,216.55
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
4. Irina Ivanovna Bondareva 661,240.02 5,298.31
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
5. Tamara Yakovlevna Buneyeva 203,001.76 1,402.03
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
6. Nadezhda Vasilyevna Buneyeva 245,953.66 2,093.18
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
7. Svetlana Yakovlevna Butkova 292,639.85 2,566.63
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
8. Nina Yevgenyevna Bykova 278,481.28 1,993.39
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
9. Tatyana Nikolayevna Garmysheva 118,682.79 1,055.66
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
10. Natalya Viktorovna Gladysheva 283,393.7 2,392.66
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
11. Marina Vasilyevna Gunkina 207,882.42 1,769.19
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
12. Olga Gennadyevna Dvoretskaya 128,708.93 1,321.3
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
13. Lyudmila Pavlovna Zhidkova 545,437.19 4,253.24
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
14. Raisa Aleksandrovna Izmaylova 216,922.49 1,934.91
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
15. Lyubov Alekseyevna Karabutova 281,795.51 2,006.08
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
16. Svetlana Leonidovna Kozhokina 285,847.06 2,551.35
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
17. Lyudmila Pavlovna Kopylova 233,794.43 2,095.32
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
18. Tamara Semenovna Kuznetsova 353,814.42 3,147.33
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
19. Larisa Vasilyevna Maltseva 367,010.89 2,143.44
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
20. Larisa Arkadyevna Milyayeva 161,358.24 1,472.63
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
21. Lidiya Viktorovna Nemtsova 175,042.26 1,564.89
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
22. Lyudmila Aleksandrovna Neupokoyeva 204,258.86 1,676.87
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
23. Yelena Viktorovna Pavlova Not submitted None
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
24. Svetlana Grigoryevna Polishchuk 246,592.75 1,474.68
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
25. Tatyana Mikhaylovna Poritskaya 257,161.79 2,061.28
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
26. Mariya Sergeyevna Reshetnikova 450,084.87 3,611.29
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
27. Irina Yegorovna Roshchupkina 281,716.58 2,778.65
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
28. Nadezhda Vasilyevna Rychkova 99,257.33 836.68
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
29. Galina Mikhaylovna Ryazantseva 351,451.5 2,699.91
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
30. Galina Gennadyevna Sanina 244,478.56 2,132.83
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
31. Lyudmila Alekseyevna Semchenko 884,732.53 7,290.15
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
32. Antonina Viktorovna Sergeyeva 274,509.26 3,138.28
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
33. Vera Mitrofanovna Serikova 125,865.52 1,125.24
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
34. Tatyana Ivanovna Sirotenko 911,780.86 7,388.04
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
35. Aleftina Aleksandrovna Skomorokhova 424,462.36 1,829.36
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
36. Natalya Valeryanovna Solovyeva 870,109.98 6,474.68
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
37. Vladimir Yuzikovich Talko 110,894.09 1,125.24
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
38. Nina Ivanovna Tolkacheva 312,801.4 3,197.81
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
39. Vera Yefimovna Trukhacheva 203,889.92 1,504.36
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
40. Yelena Nikolayevna Chernikova 93,863.31 812.22
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
41. Lyudmila Aleksandrovna Chernykh 230,067.33 2,321.55
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
42. Valentina Vasilyevna Yakovleva 241,280.7 2,141.16
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
43. Svetlana Leonidovna Yakovtseva 228,458.16 1,882.84
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
44. Nadezhda Gennadyevna Yakushchenko 97,186.72 911.59
+---------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
45. Emma Ivanovna Yakushchenko 289,587.76 2,034.35
L---------------------------------------+-------------+-----------
|
